Checklist: website relaunch for law firms and fiduciaries
For: Law firms, notaries, fiduciary and audit firms, family offices
Updated: 2026-10
A law firm relaunch succeeds when practice areas and people are clearly structured, old addresses are cleanly redirected, content is factual under professional rules, the contact form is designed for confidentiality, structured data and local details are correct, and indexing and enquiries are measured after launch.
A website relaunch is both an opportunity and a risk for law firms and fiduciary offices. A new website can improve trust and findability considerably. Without care, though, rankings, links and listings built up over years are lost.
This checklist complements the general relaunch checklist with the points that matter most for advisory professions bound by secrecy. Each step states how you know it is done.
The checklist
- 01
Clarify goals and target groups
Record which clients should be reached, which practice areas take priority and in which languages the website appears. The structure follows from this.
Done when: Target groups, prioritised practice areas and languages are recorded in writing.
- 02
Inventory and plan redirects
Record all existing addresses, especially pages with visitors or external links, and assign each a new target page. Without redirects, rankings and links are lost.
Done when: A complete list of old addresses with target pages exists and is implemented before launch.
- 03
Practice area pages and profiles
A dedicated page per practice area with an understandable description and typical questions; a profile per professional with practice areas, admissions, education and languages.
Done when: Every prioritised practice area and every professional has its own agreed page.
- 04
Write factually under professional rules
Keep content objective and informative, without promises of success or sensational comparisons. State titles, admissions and specialist titles correctly. The professional-law assessment remains with the firm.
Done when: All copy is approved by the responsible partners.
- 05
Design the contact form for confidentiality
Encrypted transmission, no unnecessary mandatory fields, a note not to send confidential details before the mandate is accepted and conflicts checked, and processing that does not pass enquiries to advertising or analytics services.
Done when: The form asks only for necessary details, includes the note and does not pass enquiries to third parties for advertising.
- 06
Data protection and tracking
A privacy notice under the revised FADP naming the services actually used, and no tracking tools a law firm website does not need.
Done when: The privacy notice matches the services in use, and no unnecessary tracking scripts run.
- 07
Structured data and local details
Structured data for the firm, for example as LegalService or AccountingService, and for its people; name, address and phone identical everywhere; align the Google business profile and directory listings with the new website.
Done when: Structured data is valid, and all listings show the same details and the new website.
- 08
Launch and measurement
After launch, spot-check redirects, submit the sitemap in Search Console, request indexing of key pages and watch indexing and enquiries in the first weeks.
Done when: The sitemap is submitted, redirects are checked and indexing is monitored.
Common mistakes
- —Old addresses without redirects, losing rankings and external links.
- —A one-pager instead of practice area pages, not found for specific questions.
- —A contact form asking for confidential details before a conflict check was possible.
- —Tracking and advertising scripts passing client enquiries to third parties.
- —A Google business profile and directories still pointing to old pages after the relaunch.
What this checklist does not cover
- —This checklist is not legal advice. The professional-law assessment of content remains with the firm.
- —It does not replace the general technical relaunch review but complements it with sector-specific points.
- —Multilingual websites add requirements for language versions and their technical linking.
- —It reflects the position as of October 2026.
Parent service: Website Development
Matching offers
Websites for law firms, fiduciaries and family offices: trustworthy, fast, findable
Law firms, fiduciaries and family offices do not need a loud website but a trustworthy one: clearly described practice areas and people, factual language, fast and secure technology, findability in search engines and AI answers, and data protection that matches their own standards. We build exactly this kind of website.
Website relaunch with an SEO and GEO foundation
A relaunch that protects visibility instead of losing it: we capture every URL with impressions from Search Console, build the new website on Next.js with technical SEO, structured data and a GEO foundation, permanently redirect old URLs to the matching new pages, and check indexing and redirects after go-live.
FAQ
Do you lose rankings in a relaunch?
Not necessarily. With complete redirects, equivalent or better content and clean technology, rankings usually hold and often improve. Losses arise mainly from missing redirects.
Why a note in the contact form?
Before a mandate is accepted, no conflict check has taken place. A note asking people to describe their concern only in broad terms at first protects both prospects and the firm.
Does a law firm website need tracking?
For measuring findability, Search Console is usually enough. Advertising and tracking tools are rarely needed for a law firm website and fit poorly with the standard of confidentiality.
More checklists
EU AI Act conformity: a checklist for the first pass
A workable first pass through the EU AI Act has six parts: know which AI runs in the business, determine your role for each system, classify under Article 6, check transparency duties separately, ensure AI literacy, and file everything so it can be found under scrutiny.
High risk or not: reasoning an Annex III classification properly
High-risk classification follows a fixed order: first the deployment area under Annex III, then whether the system plays a substantive role in the decision, then the exemption in Article 6(3). Each of those steps has to be documented with reasoning.
AI literacy under Article 4: from intention to evidence that holds
Article 4 asks for measures to support AI literacy, measured against role, context and the people affected. It becomes workable in four moves: form roles, set a depth per role, train accordingly, and record attendance with date, content and the link to the role.